Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Monty Lenard who wrote (121843)	8/6/2000 9:03:35 AM
From: manfredhasler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

Monty, Re: I think what you are saying is that many phonemenon cannot be explained....they just occur and the more the "experts" try to explain and label them the less credibility the expert should be assigned. Yes I think that many phenomenon cannot be explained. However having some scientific background I assume that most phenomenon have some underlying mechanism. For the sake of simplicity I would like to apply this as well for the case of gap filling in a given stock. If a underlying mechanism is not implied I think it does not make much sense to label various kind of gaps with different names - other then impress people without much background. In case however the underlying mechanism is known - or at least looked after - it does help very much to distinguish them by different nomenclature. For didactic reasons as well as for a better communication. That's why I am looking for the mechanism first. Regards, Manfred