SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: EJhonsa who wrote (6941)8/8/2000 7:41:56 PM
From: samim anbarcioglu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Hi Eric,
<<Why would DoCoMo have to pay royalties to Qualcomm? >>

This happened about a month ago:

That point was underscored Monday when the Japanese Patent Office and
the European Patent Office upheld three of Qualcomm's patents applying to
Code Division Multiple Access, or CDMA, wireless technology. The patents
had been challenged in Japan last year by Nokia Corp. (NOK), L.M.
Ericsson Telephone Co. (ERICY) and Japanese wireless phone company
NTT DoCoMo Inc. (J.NTX). The ruling sent Qualcomm's stock up almost
11% Monday to 69 13/16.

Still, the company's stock is down 65% from its early January high, in part
because investors believe competitors like Nokia and Ericsson can build
CDMA-based networks and handsets without paying Qualcomm



To: EJhonsa who wrote (6941)8/8/2000 8:16:11 PM
From: foundation  Respond to of 34857
 
Why would DoCoMo have to pay royalties to Qualcomm?
----------
Even though it will be an indirect payment, NTT still will pay QCOM - included in payments to LU or ERICY for base stations, and through phone vendors as well - to be passed on to subscribers or eaten.

No free lunch.

regards,
blg