Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (85161)	8/9/2000 3:49:18 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Doggone it, Cosmo, you and I are going around in circles. Just whom do you mean by "we"? Americans? If so, then I would dispute your thesis that their notions of race are based on "historical, 19th-century imperialism." I would say, rather, that they are based on -- or better, still colored by -- the American slave-holding experience. (Slave-holding antedates imperialism by millenia.) My own impression is that the primary tensions in this country remain the black-white ones, fueled by overt or latent resentment on the one side, and by conscious or unconscious fear and/or guilt on the other. These days, whites seem to me to be infinitely more relaxed about Asians than they were a century ago -- perhaps because they feel they bear no historical guilt towards them (aside from making it hard for them to immigrate). And frictions between other "races" (blacks and Korean Asians, say) have absolutely nothing to do with 19th century imperialism. I find it interesting that the French and the Portuguese, who were no slouches as imperialists in Africa, are virtually color-blind at home. Yet Russians, who never held a single piece of territory inhabited by black-skinned people, seem to have a horror of Africans, or of anyone with a dark complexion, for that matter.