Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pierceaero who wrote (28440)	8/10/2000 3:14:13 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Respond to of 35685

pierce arrow ... Wow! Very interesting ... for some reason I've always thought the repubs were good (or 'better') for stock market ... another ignorant assumption on my part, perhaps. Will follow with interest others' remarks on the statistics you report in this post. As well as your own opinions, should you choose to post them. "b-i-a" ###

To: pierceaero who wrote (28440)	8/10/2000 6:55:19 PM
From: elpolvo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

karen -- don't make any stock bets based on those stats. political party and stock market performance are not connected in a karmic way. keep looking though - you'll find something that is tied to market performance in a cause and effect relationship. -polvs

To: pierceaero who wrote (28440)	8/15/2000 3:56:04 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35685

(Oops/EDIT) PierceArrow (Karen): Again, this information astonishes me. Because I've always (20 years or more?) assumed the Repubs were 'better for investors.') Could you direct me (would you mind, rather) somewhere for a source here? Want to provide to others. EDIT of original post: Oops ... Ned Davis Research, as you said, Pierceaero...I'll go there now. Sorry. THANKS! 'bonstrosity' ###