SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: paul who wrote (34319)8/10/2000 11:45:56 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Re: "16 System boards in 1 E10K gives you well 16 mighty S80's since it seems that they can only compete against Sun's 4 way servers."

May I ask how you came to this conclusion??

THE WATSONYOUTH



To: paul who wrote (34319)8/11/2000 8:42:44 AM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
paul - I would hardly hold up OPS as an example of a partitionable database. OPS attempts to present a single image via a DLM and shared storage, exactly the opposite of partitionable data management with distributed queries. The IBM benchmark was run on DB2. Oracle will need a whole new architecture to support partitioned and distributed queries in any serious way.

The weak spot in IBM's story is simply the lack of penetration outside of Big Blue accounts for either their database or S80 technology.

As far as real-world examples, there are plenty - they just don't happen to be in the volume mainstream. Architecturally, one can look at either DB2 or other long-standing examples like Tandem's partitionable SQL, both of which have been around for a long time, to see the benefits for the kind of data now being stored to support the web.

I am hardly arguing against either the UE10000 or SUNW performance - I hold SUNW, not IBM. But this particular spin by SUNW is just an attempt to put a finger on the dike while they get their next generation story together.