SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (4500)8/11/2000 1:36:54 AM
From: chic_hearneRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: Kash: Re: "What is earliest you see it introduced - is Q1 2001 feasible."

Paul: I doubt that is possible - the first silicon will have to be rock solid (possible ?) but the 0.13 micron process will probably need another quarter to get it into production readiness - to enable a clean transfer from TD to Manufacturing.

My guess is Mid Q2 2001 time frame.


Paul,

They are doing this on Al?

At .13um, that's where I hear of problems coming when looking at Al vs. Cu. Do think you can get the same yields on Al as Cu?

thanks in advance for your honest answer,

chic



To: Paul Engel who wrote (4500)8/11/2000 1:39:27 AM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Paul,

Is the .13u process they are talking about for both Tualatin and Northwood going to be aluminium or copper interconnects?

Joe



To: Paul Engel who wrote (4500)8/11/2000 1:43:43 AM
From: TechieGuy-altRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Paul,
>> My guess, Intel wanted the performance boost - especially for lower cost XEON versions.

Wow! Why so much emphasis on coppermine? 0.13, 200Mhz FSB, 512KB L2 cache? Mid 2001 launch date! Won't P4 been out for more than 8 months by then?

I presume that Intel will have limited capacity on 0.13 next year, why would they not want to ramp P4 to 0.13, decrease core size, decrease power, boost MHz and blast AMD out of the water?

Mid 2001 introduction seems to be awfull late for the previous generation processor, when the next generation is supposed to be out for >=8 months!

TIA,

TG

P.S. The comment about xeons does not sound right. I doubt that (multi processor) Xeons would ever be released with a 200Mhz bus. Too difficult to do with Intel's (current) GTL+ bus.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (4500)8/11/2000 1:58:05 AM
From: Ali ChenRespond to of 275872
 
<My guess, Intel wanted the performance boost - especially for lower cost XEON versions.>

I guess your guess is right. By boosting FSB twice
they may get 10% gain in Windows apps and maybe up
to 35% in Spec2k. Bigger L2 may give extra
10-15%. This is a lot.
If AMD fails to master 150/300 EV6 for
Athlons, they are in big, big trouble. AMD already
failed to get into 133 FSB on time, and is fighting
the lost battle in performance with puny 100-MHz FSB.