Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William Hunt who wrote (26345)	8/11/2000 2:40:31 PM
From: Sonny McWilliams	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27012

Bill. Thanks for info on TXN CEO. I have been keeping my eye on TXN for a purchase. Re: Has any of the candidates an energy policy? Yes. Bush is for more exploration here and for stronger prodding of our allies that produce oil, plus other things, including hydrogen. But some want to tear down those dams that could give us hydrogen. Things have been neglected on this front under Clinton/Gore. Like I mentioned before: Their own energy sec. Richardson has said that they were sleeping at the wheel. And I can't see it improving under Gore/Lieberman. Gore is on the fav. list of the Sierra Club. Exploration is not on the front burner with this group. A little too aggressive on the environment front. Don't get me wrong. I am for the environment but it has to have its limits if we don't want to go back to the cave time. They don't want nuclear, hydrogen, oil and you name it. Talking about Gore's slogan: A Bush administration would set us back to the past. Well, again, under Gore we could go back to candle light and horse buggy. <G> Sonny