SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: semiconeng who wrote (4694)8/12/2000 12:34:56 AM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
semiconeng,

And you're right, it's all in the software baby. I could cut and paste all the web links to the announcements about IA-64 support, but I'm sure you've seen plenty.

Did Microsoft "announce" Win64? Where is it? Merced is years late, while Microsoft may be still a year away from having an OS with minimum level of stability.

Meaning, if Intel was on time and delivered Itanium say 2 years ago, there would be no Windows OS of it for next 3 years.

In my opinion, software is the slowest moving part, the weakest link in the chain, and the more critical the software is to the success of a new chip, the lower the odds are that this chip will succeed.

Joe



To: semiconeng who wrote (4694)8/12/2000 5:16:33 AM
From: Gopher BrokeRespond to of 275872
 
I honestly believe that when system administrators are sitting there thinking "Should I buy intel's second generation IA-64 McKinley, or go with this band-aid new SledgeHammer product", I just don't believe they'll pick AMD.

I also believe that they will go for the most stable solution. I just disagree that their choice will be IA64, however long in the tooth that architecture is becoming.