Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific North West Capital Corporation-PFN on Alberta -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumell who wrote (1943)	8/12/2000 5:32:45 PM
From: Berry Picker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2255

RE>>Haywood started selling and it was misinterpreted as PFN insiders selling<< Bob did you look at the selling in the last two days? It is very doubtful that Haywood sold off 180 thousand shares without some big holders taking a loss a dumping. If anyone thinks that Haywood merely downgraded the play and then a whole bunch of small players (at Haywood only) all dumped out the same day it is nothing but fantasy. Ex House Bought Av/Sh Sold Av/Sh Net $Net V 62 Haywood 0 0.00 180300 0.91 -180300 164542 V 73 Sprott 0 0.00 16500 0.86 -16500 14135 V 9 Nesbitt 36550 0.89 46500 0.88 -9950 8270 V 11 Yorkton 19600 0.87 28007 0.90 -8407 8324 V 83 Research 3000 0.85 9000 0.86 -6000 5190 V 6 Union 10500 0.90 10800 0.91 -300 341 Haywood sold 180,300 and bought NONE !!! Sprott sold 16,500 and were the second biggest seller! If it was small players then Haywood spent a lot of time talking little pee-ons like us into selling. It seems the little "believers" were the one who have held on and bought even more of that stuff that was sold. Some big holders at Haywood sold there is no way arround it. Friday it was Sprout that was the biggest seller! Biggest buyer both daze??? Who else - Greenline = little players mostly.