Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Computerized Thermal Imaging CIO (formerly COII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ripalip who wrote (5376)	8/14/2000 4:28:01 AM
From: ripalip	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6039

Grumpy,**a NeW PROTOCOL ** Have you ever thought PROTOCOL may change as we know it ? Now just think about this .... Your a woman that is dead afraid of mamograms ! Not to mention the related risks involved. Most if not all women break into a sweat when they describe the whole ordeal. Read my post from the SF Journal. I'm taking for granted your already aware of all the "pitfalls" of what most consider, ANCIENT technology... Gold standard or not. Let's say the word gets out that THERE'S this OTHER technology that is let's say, 96% accurate in detecting breast cancer, maybe even MORE accurate ? We WILL see. It's SAFE(no side effects), It's PLEASANT and NONevasive (no ####'s in a vice !)and it's CHEAP too ! Now for the bottom line or "NEW PROTOCOL" Theirs a MULTITUDE of women out their that will never have a mamogram ! PERIOD ! You ask why? Ever have your #### in a VICE ?? Hope not ! And then their's that RISK thing! Some women have DIED because of mamograms! ... you know the old saying ".. the cure that KILLS you " My wife is 37 years old and she wouldn't have a mamogram for the death of her. And she has ALOT of friends with the same mentality ! But she would STAND IN LINE for CTI ! And SO WOULD her friends. Now think of all the younger women that will go for a CTI scan just because it's SAFE, NONEVASIVE and INEXPENSIVE ! Women that would otherwise do NOTHING at all ! What do they have to loose ? NOTHING at all ! Think of all the lives SAVED ! LOTS OF LIVES SAVED ! We're talking about opening up a whole NEW market Grumpy Boy ! A whole "NEW PROTOCOL" Was this to simple for ya gRuMpY bOy ? ENUF SAID RIP

To: ripalip who wrote (5376)	8/14/2000 9:44:03 AM
From: who cares?	Respond to of 6039

Gee I see one of the requirements that the author of that article has for an alternative is that it be ACCURATE, well gee that just leaves CTI's system out right off doesn't it? Funny that Dave, when confronted about accuracy from Bloomberg's David Evans, chose not to argue that CTI's system is more accurate. Could that be because, it's not? Women should demand alternatives, such as a counterpart to the PSA antigen blood test for prostate cancer. This should be possible because the tiniest breast cancers are already shedding cells into the blood stream that can serve as markers for the disease. Man you better start praying that God not only bless CTI, but also that God hinder's anyone trying to develope this method, since it sounds like doom for CTI. CMB