Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SisterMaryElephant who wrote (5061)	8/15/2000 12:29:13 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Steve, Of course the thread is biased. That is why it is called the AMD thread. The Intel thread is heavily biased towards Intel, and the longs on the Rambus thread threaten contrarians with legal action on a daily basis. Apparently the threads reflect their parent company. Scumbria

To: SisterMaryElephant who wrote (5061)	8/15/2000 12:49:27 AM
From: chic_hearne	Respond to of 275872

Re: OK, listen, between you and chic hern, I have been basically called a fool and a clown Steve, You were a genius to buy Intel back in 1991. You are a moron if you hold it and believe you will get better than 5% returns over the next 10 years. You might as well buy bonds. See Bambs' post about what it will take Cisco stock to continue to go up. Intel is in a very similar situation This has nothing to do with AMD. chic

To: SisterMaryElephant who wrote (5061)	8/15/2000 12:52:17 AM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Steve re <<OK, listen, between you and chic hern, I have been basically called a fool and a clown.>> I think it is time for you to listen. First of all, I did not call you a fool, I said such statements are foolish, which I don't think is the same thing. And even for that I apologized. Now, I several times tried to give you a hint as to why Intel will not grow 50 folds over the next 9 years. Here is another try...Even if every Person on earth had a computer and used Internet based on INTC servers and communication IC, Intel would not grow 50 fold. It is absolutely mind boggling to me that you have not conceded this point. It is simple math, multiply 450 Billion by the factor of 45. Then divide it by the total number of people on earth..... If you just do it, you'll see. Either way, I will not waist any more of my time. Re <<That is what I like about this thread, it is so clean and unbiased, and all objective posts are welcomed. And, of course anyone who calls someone else a "bad name" is prevented from posting.>> Objective and well thought out posts are indeed welcomed. Yours clearly was not well thought out, but it is still welcomed any way. What is worse is that when your points were challenged, you just used on liners and did not respond. Mani