SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lucretius who wrote (11283)8/15/2000 5:58:06 PM
From: MythMan  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
I don't remember wtf happened in 1980. I wouldn't have guessed that...



To: Lucretius who wrote (11283)8/15/2000 6:37:44 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
more on the palladium mess:

From Bridge -

Many players linked the thin trading volumes to NYMEX's hike of margin requirements this week. The dramatic increases in margins have discouraged market players from trading palladium, they contend. "NYMEX is trying to retire the contract, or only encourage commercial use," contended one frustrated trader. "But even commercials would find it difficult to justify these margins." A NYMEX spokeswoman Tuesday would not offer an explanation as to why margins were changed, which is standard response from the exchange. She said such moves are made "to support the contract and ensure its reliability as a financial tool."

**************************************************************************************************
butler comments:

As opposed to, "we only got 171 contracts of physical inventory. We can't let the longs demand delivery without a fight. We'll shake 'em out. If we have to certify the shorts have warehouse receipts on first notice day, we'll lose control of the price. If this don't work, we'll try liquidation only - that ususally does the trick. Anythin' but free markets. That's the standard response from the exchange." bbl