Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (5654)	8/16/2000 9:24:24 PM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

arctic bluefinger would you please comment on this post please...im also curious to the answers....i have read many of your posts and find few things that just seem a bit fishy...please respond and thank you for your precious time... Message 14225053

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (5654)	8/16/2000 11:01:36 PM
From: DWCraig	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 19428

"Judging by their track records" isn't easy, since you refuse to post a "Short List" or acknowledge having made even one bad call in the past (are you still short CIEN?). Lacking a short list, any due diligence of your posts to this thread (what you call "specious homework") reveals a mediocre trader who occasionally makes a good call. It also reveals someone who has no personal dignity or respect for others. You may be "sitting on Ft. Knox," but you exhibit all the signs of someone with low self-esteem. Anyone with the trading prowess you claim to have would not stoop to the childish, petty, and frankly vulgar comments you spew out on this and other threads. The byline of your thread is: "Short sale candidates backed up with facts and logic worth examining to hedge the long side of your portfolio." That sounds good. It would seem to invite an examination of your picks ('candidates'). Unfortunately, any examination of them is stopped short by a barrage of personal attacks. You simply have to be right, don't you? It's more important to you, being right, than examining your picks, facing your bad calls, and learning. Even (gasp) learning from others. Well, I'm glad to see you weren't serious about putting me on 'Ignore'. Maybe you'll learn a thing or two. Regards, DWCraig

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (5654)	8/17/2000 12:23:14 AM
From: P314159d	Respond to of 19428

AWWW SHOOT, MANN DA PIKER'S BACK, ANNNNDDDA HE'S HAPPY...BIKER'S AROUND THE CORNER had some STEAKS TO CELIBRATE and some good PUDDIN', WHY? CAUSE OF THE REVERSAL IN WSTL as you drew your FEEBLE CALL TO ARMS (OR PUT TO ARMS). it is draining I know , BEING WRONG LIKE THIS DURING EXPIRATION, BUT HEY! PUDDIN'... HAY SF StokeR, YOU KNOW ALL BOUGHT DEM APPLES! HEY HEY, GOOD PUDDIN. gimme -headman

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (5654)	8/18/2000 9:48:36 AM
From: DWCraig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

Auric, are you still short EXDS?