Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Silicon Investor ThinkTank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: silversoldier a/k/a SI Sy who wrote (1726)	8/16/2000 10:52:38 PM
From: Roger Sherman	Respond to of 3372

Sy, not meaning to butt in on your most excellent dialogue with Bryan... And I do think Puna's suggestion of a new name for the "merging" of both our beloved Go2Net, with some really "spaced out" company called Info (something or other), being called Go2Space is an outstanding recommendation! However, for some reason, I have been beginning to form a certain attachment to the potential name of "InYourFace." Perhaps that's just my own personal "short-term" naivete, based on my fear of potentially losing almost every single investment penny I ever possessed. :) But, as usual (and as a "true American"), I will submit to the majority opinion. :) Very truly yours, Roger

To: silversoldier a/k/a SI Sy who wrote (1726)	8/17/2000 10:06:31 AM
From: WTMHouston	Respond to of 3372

<<Not having heard from you about this matter, I, of course, viewed this as a convenient escape from feasance on your part. Please alter my impression of your character by advising of your assent to perform the responsibilities you assumed in your new position.>> I am sure that he hesitates to articulate for fear that he may deviate from the true course of rectitude. <g> Troy

To: silversoldier a/k/a SI Sy who wrote (1726)	8/17/2000 2:36:26 PM
From: BryanB	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3372

Dear Sy (herein after referred to as the "Party of the First Part"), In consideration and direct response to the Party of the First Part's plea and submission of a bilateral translation for the key reference terminology which may or may not be utilized to refer directly to the pending combination of the Party of the Second Part and the Party of the Third Part, I must render the following unqualified opinion. With respect to such action herewith and henceforth, and upon additional testimonial investigation with special regard to direct suggestions supplied by Puna (herein after referred to as "The Party of the Fourth Part") and Roger Sherman (who, in regard to such party's aforementioned mental state, shall herein after be referred to as "The Party of the Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Parts"), the Terminology Committee (formed in total by certified agents of both the Party of the Second Part and the Party of the Third Part) subsequently agreed, quid pro quo, to review the aforementioned suggestions. Upon such aforementioned review, and in accordance with civil due process, the Terminology Committee has rendered several distinct, ubiquitous and obtuse clarifications. First, the unilateral support by the Party of the First Part in due course and direction toward the Party of the Fourth Part and the Party of the Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Parts is noted for the record as both profound and meaningless. Second, the Committee recognizes and applauds the creativity and inventiveness of the Party of the Fourth Part and the Part of the Fifth, Six and Seventh Parts, although the Committee also stipulates the possibility that such aforementioned creativity was artificially induced by foreign chemical substances. Finally, in accordance with Article Nine of the UPC Code, the Committee shall issue the following public statement to directly address the contributory nature of the bilateral terminology classification suggestions: To wit: With reference to the Party of the First Part, such aggravating effervescence of oratorical sonorousities is not only irrelevant, inconsequential and highly superfluous, but the imbecilic eccentricities are irrefutably infelicitous. Sincerely, courteously, and with humble regard, Bryan