Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Silicon Investor ThinkTank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BryanB who wrote (1729)	8/17/2000 5:56:07 PM
From: levy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3372

Bryan, I am concerned about you.... this post of yours reminds me of the movie the shinning. I am not sure if you can understand this and I know this is not your job anymore but I think it would be a good idea if you stay occupied. On the links listed below when you hit broker research,dsp/drip or "institutions" (sorry no pun intended) it doesn't bring you to your set menu bar at top but all the others do. Charts \| News \| Financials \| Discussion \| EPS Est. \| Profile \| Institutions \| SEC \| Hist.Prices \| Industry_Grps. \| Broker Research \| DSP/DRIP \| On24

To: BryanB who wrote (1729)	8/17/2000 8:31:23 PM
From: Roger Sherman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3372

Bryan, we are so pleased.... So the medication is finally beginning to kick in. And if I may be so bold to interject a few brief comments from all the "Parties" involved...we've all voted to send you another box of #2 pencils to the "home." And being "The Party of the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Parts," permit me to personally congratulate you for what appears to be an extremely valiant struggle with coherency. Perhaps I can attempt to simplify what you so painfully tried to communicate to all the "Parties," with the following summary or your ramblings, "The name stays, so deal with it"! And please permit me to also remind you of the purpose of this thread, which is to (try not to) Think (while completely) Tank(ed), on any "foreign chemical substances." :) BTW, several of us have decided to join you at the "home," for a little R&R. In fact, the "sign-up" list has been growing daily, and is becoming huge! <g> Praying for a "complete" recovery for us all, Roger :) PS. And attempting such really REALLY big words too (like "sonorousities" and "infelicitous")! Cool!!! This tells us all that your doctors feel relatively safe letting you have (at least brief) access to the World's most dangerous weapon...a dictionary. :) PPS. As an additional incentive for a complete "recovery": Message 14232582

To: BryanB who wrote (1729)	8/18/2000 1:00:35 AM
From: WTMHouston	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3372

ROFLMAO.... <<such aforementioned creativity was artificially induced by foreign chemical substances.>> Kind of why I expected the time on the post to be 2:36 a.m. instead of p.m. In any event, if you EVER want a new career, you could make a killing as a lawyer or a political speech writer. <g> Judges are much less hostile than the SI crowd -- and the general public, well, some things don't need explaining. You might even have the capacity to solve Abe's famous political trilogy of impossibility. Troy PS - I am curious, though, whether you blew a fuse in the SI spell checker? On second thought, I'll just bet that your post was actually a beta test for SI's new thesaurus function.