Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lee Lichterman III who wrote (27795)	8/16/2000 10:31:52 PM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42787

Careful about that nascent bullish bias you feel forming in the TA part of your brain. -g I see it too and many charts are a couple of points from taking out serious resistance, but this is a head-fake, albeit probably quite tradable. We can not go much higher with sentiment as it is and a falling dollar. I do not know when it will happen, but we must hit a wall somewhere on the credit expansion. The inverted yield curve that has lasted as long as this one is trying to tell us something as well. That commercial position on the spoos is also scary. No way that is just to cover long positions -- it's just too large. If the DOW prints da cheif's target I will start a thread devoted to my own stupidity and his clairvoyance. -g In the end I do nat care. I want to be on the right side of the trade much more than I want to be right.

To: Lee Lichterman III who wrote (27795)	8/17/2000 9:03:45 PM
From: Tulvio Durand	Respond to of 42787

Thanks, Lee for the detailed response. I, too, have been wondering about Cisco's one-penny-above for some time and your reasoning for their astonishing "control" seems quite plausible. It would be a lot more credible if they'd miss once even if it were in the wrong direction. Clearly their finances need to be watched more closely in next couple quarters to see if there's a real problem. Thanks, Tulvio