Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sdr who wrote (14155)	8/17/2000 11:35:53 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

sdr, there is an easy way to answer your question. Why continue to speculate on something about which you don't know, when the answer is so easily at hand? You KNOW that you don't know, and admit it, but persist in speculating anyway. Just call the companies to "verify" my employment. I am, quite simply, entertained by this thread. And, in addition, curious enough about the real story about the rise to 24 and change to follow the story until the truth is known. And I'll bet there is a fascinating story behind the persistent appearance of EDIG on RB's front-page "most popular thread" list. (Who ever first thunk of THAT - that it might be possible to float the price of an OTC-BB stock by filling a thread with nonsense to keep it "popular" and thus on a front-page list?) I have no doubt that the truth will eventually be known. I hope we can read about it some day, in Wired, or Red Herring, or some other publication. I suspect it will be one of those "it's amazing how gullible people are" kinda stories. But, who knows, it could be a big success story. We shall see, but either way, bet there is a hell of a story there.

To: sdr who wrote (14155)	8/17/2000 11:41:50 AM
From: JimC1997	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

I find it more interesting to watch the price of the stock climb, than reading the same boring monologs from Carl and obsessive/complusive rantings from Jan Tara. Despite the arrogant assurances from Jon and Carl that the posted conversation with Robert Putnam would hurt the stock, it is recovering nicely today. Perhaps the 50,000+ shareholders in this company would rather listen to company management than two sad individuals who spend most of their time airing their bitterness. JimC