SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mani1 who wrote (5444)8/17/2000 4:59:49 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Mani,

The actual bulk thermal conductivity of the fins does not need to be anything over 50 W/mK. Aluminum is around 185 and Copper is at 400. Making the fins out of Copper gives virtually no advantage and the added weight puts stress on the package.

I think the added weight not relevant compared to pressure needed by the clip attaching the heatsink to the CPU. (To satisfy AMD's spec for the termal solution)

If you read some hardware newsgroups, it actually is a problem. There are very few Socket A heatsinks out there that satisfy AMD's requirements. There are some reports of people cracking their core while attaching the heatsink to the CPU. Basically, similar reports that we have heard about Intel's FC CPUs.

I think AMD should hurry up and sell the Boxed versions of the CPU with the heatsink already attached to avoid these problems people will encounter in the DYO market.

Joe



To: Mani1 who wrote (5444)8/17/2000 11:49:38 PM
From: Ali ChenRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Again, <Coppermine consumes much less power than Athlon.>
If 30% less is "much less", then much less:).

<I have not seen any "all copper" heat sink. That is got to be the dumbest thing I have ever heard.>
<Making the fins out of Copper gives virtually no advantage... There is virtually no thermal gradient in the fins..>
I don't want to enter into another useless discussion.
I guess you just need to buy a cheap $25,000 infrared
camera to see how reality fares relative to your
statements. I could not find that link to newly
intorduced copper heatsinks for P-III
from some recent Expo,
but just to slightly support my statements:

Copper heat sinks
micforg.co.jp

rtcgroup.com
- copper fins are 20% more efficient

coolwhip.dk

Regards,
- Ali



To: Mani1 who wrote (5444)8/18/2000 11:23:57 AM
From: EricRRRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Copper only helps as the base heat spreader where minimum lateral thermal gradient is key. There is virtually no thermal gradient in the fins as the air convection is main thermal bottle neck at that point.

If that were true, couldn't one dramaticly improve a heatsink by simply increasing the size of the fins?