Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (5599)	8/18/2000 3:44:13 PM
From: Epinephrine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

hmaly, <The cost of doing a background check makes doing them prohibitive in most instances. Unless the cheating problem becomes persuasive, it will cost less money, and fewer feathers are ruffled to just do a miminal check. Thats business. > That may be business but that doesn't change the nature of the ultimate responsibility if something goes wrong. Take for example: I don't read much (not enough time) but I listen to books on tape in my car (unabridged), the latest one was an account of one of the first successful submarine rescues. To make a long story short a submarine commander was in test dives for a new submarine named the Squalus. He dove the sub and water flowed in through the diesel engine's exhaust and ventilation system. He had closed the high induction valves that kept the water out but they malfunctioned and he had not had the backup valves closed because they were difficult and burdensome to operate. The commander and some of his crew were rescued but even though not closing the backup valves was a common practice in that class of subs he lost his command over it. The navy completely revamped the backup valves (and the original valves) in future submarines which to me is an indication that they knew that the design wasn't optimal but that didn't change his responsibility. He didn't weasel, he didn't blame the valves and he didn't say "yeah but no one closes them" he took the rap. And it was probably that kind of integrity that saw him through to rebuilding his career and ending up an Admiral before he retired. Just an example. Regards, Epinephrine

To: hmaly who wrote (5599)	8/18/2000 7:32:27 PM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 275872

hmaly, <The cost of doing a background check makes doing them prohibitive in most instances. Unless the cheating problem becomes persuasive, it will cost less money, and fewer feathers are ruffled to just do a miminal check. Thats business.> I am trying to understand your way of communicating information related to AMD ... First, you were talking about allocation and re-allocation of limited engineering resources that led to "limited success" of the 750 project. Later you "introduced" an example of employees with false PhDs as a reason of poor performance of some relevant division. How I assume that your examples are not appearing from the thin air... Are you hinting that the other part of the "Irongate" is that some designers and chip architects appeared to be with bootleg credentials? So, what is your implication with regard to future of the 760 chipset?