SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (85826)8/20/2000 7:52:40 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I think that the '60s was the crucial decade, when more harm than good occurred.

I'm curious: what harm do you think was done? It seems to me that a lot of good came out of the '60s. The civil rights and women's rights movements may not have solved all of the problems they addressed (that is only natural; problems that have festered for centuries take a good deal of solving) but they took those problems permanently out of the closet and placed them in the mainstream of political discourse, which I have to count as a huge positive achievement. Another positive was the resistance to a reckless and unnecessary war that was initiated in circumvention of legal processes and was wasting American lives and money in pursuit of no necessary objective. The effective resistance represented a real restraint on central government action by the direct application of popular pressure; I would think that a good conservative would approve. Certainly the '60s marked the first time in decades when distrust for central authority became fashionable, but I can't see why any real conservative would be upset about that.

Of course all the drug use and sexual display looked a bit sloppy, but it was mostly just fun, and after the stifling conformity of the '50s, what could anyone expect? These things have always run in cycles; a pendulum doesn't stand still.

So what caused all the harm?