SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gerald Walls who wrote (26407)8/21/2000 7:53:59 PM
From: Sonny McWilliams  Respond to of 27012
 
Well. We have no problem with the Prince of Tennessee then.

Too bad that his memory is so bad when it comes to fund raisers, unless you believe those bathroom breaks and too bad he does not know the diff. between visiting a temple and raising funds there, unless you believe that he did not tell an untruth when saying, he did not know it was a fund raiser. Just 2 little things unless there is this explanation that it depends on what is is.
And when it comes to Welfare reform he def. does not know what is is. It wasn't Gore/Clinton that reformed welfare. They fought it as long as they could.



To: Gerald Walls who wrote (26407)8/22/2000 10:07:24 AM
From: Yaacov  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27012
 
Gerald, the answer is yes. I don't think a man elected to such office has to be accountable for his private life, well sort of! ggg He has to take every pre-caution to be discreet, but if he gets caught, then he has to pay.

I am not preahing bouble standard, I am interpreting Machiavelli.