SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stevedhu who wrote (71662)8/25/2000 10:14:53 AM
From: Jon Cave  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 95453
 
DJ Alaska Governor Fumes Over Carter's Refuge Stance

This article really gets my blood boiling. I am sick and tired of a few darn liberal idiots determining policy in the US. We deserve $40 oil.

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP)--Gov. Tony Knowles angrily criticized former U.S.
President Jimmy Carter Thursday for traveling to Alaska to lobby for
national monument status for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge's coastal
plain.
Carter is in Alaska this week to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980, one of the last
laws he signed before leaving office.
Carter said Wednesday that he regrets that he let the lands act pass under
his pen without settling issues concerning the coastal plain's future. He
urged U.S. President Bill Clinton to decide once and for all by using the
Antiquities Act of 1906 to set aside the region as a national monument.
That prompted Knowles to send an angry letter to his fellow Democrat.
"Without any meaningful dialogue with the people of Alaska, you used our
state as a media prop and platform to project your message to President
Clinton," Knowles fumed.
Knowles went on to tell Carter the refuge's future should be decided by wide
debate rather than a last-minute, unilateral action by an outgoing president
"at the midnight hour."
The 1.5-million-acre coastal plain refuge is believed by many to sit atop
billions of barrels of crude. A national monument designation would place
the region off-limits to drilling.
Supporters of development say drilling for oil would be in the best
interests of Alaska's economy and an energy-thirsty nation. But the area is
seen by conservationists, in Alaska and elsewhere, as pristine and
ecologically valuable for caribou, bears and other wildlife.
Knowles said he has been assured several times by the Clinton administration
that there are no plans to declare the refuge a national monument. But the
governor said his confidence in those assurances has been shaken since
Carter weighed in on the issue.
The Alaska lands legislation signed by Carter in 1980 - a month before he
left office - added more than 100 million acres, an area the size of
California, to Alaska's national parks, wildlife refuges, national forests
and wildlands.
"Of all the things I've ever done, nothing exceeds my pride that I was given
a small role to play in the passage of this legislation," Carter said
Wednesday.
Cecil Andrus, former Idaho governor and interior secretary under Carter,
echoed the former president's call.
"In the Lower 48, we fight to save some single remnant of an area that's
already been ruined," Andrus said. "Here in Alaska we have a chance to do it
right the first time."
But Carl Portman, a spokesman for the Resource Development Council of
Alaska, said monument status for the coastal plain "would needlessly lock up
what could be the equivalent of 30 years of Saudi oil imports into the
United States."