Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: avanti77 who wrote (4216)	8/25/2000 5:19:10 PM
From: jjkirk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13572

So I missed any buying back, That's how your day go, SNDiego. Don't feel too bad at this point...I probably paid 27 points too much at the re-open. However, Jock over on the EMLX thread states that the trades will be reversed...I don't think so....jj Message 14277458

To: avanti77 who wrote (4216)	8/25/2000 6:03:16 PM
From: DOUG H	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 13572

sec.gov Make no mistake. I'm not leaving this alone nor should anyone else IMO. Someone out there committed a crime by supplying this piece of false news to the wire services. The degree of culpability of those news services is another question to be determined in the civil suits to follow. I for one would not mind seeing some heads roll in the "news business" for their behavior in this and other matters. However, a part of the school of hard knocks is that when you commit a highly visible crime, the suits at the SEC love to string up as many scalps as they can to prove their worth. We'll see, I'll be filling out the form when I get back from my brokerage office. I wonder if any market makers are having second thoughts about what they've done. Stay tuned.