Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjkirk who wrote (4220)	8/25/2000 7:04:23 PM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13572

here is their web site... nasdadr.com Any lawyers out their? What's the best recourse I want sue the lot of them, from the press, the mm's, the naz, to my broker. All of them should give me money. I'm serious about this! Greg

To: jjkirk who wrote (4220)	8/26/2000 3:45:57 AM
From: jjkirk	Respond to of 13572

I did not sell, but I put in mkt orders which were filled at the re-open @ 127...this little fraud by the market makers just added insult to injury. Just talkin' to myself this morning again... I don't understand all she said, but Mamabear seems to provide a logical explanation for the re-open at such a high price... Message 14278929 To: Surfer who wrote (562) From: Mama Bear Saturday, Aug 26, 2000 1:57 AM ET Reply # of 581 Surfer, the halt was probably requested by the company, and is appropriate when disseminating significant material news. It is done to give everyone an equal chance to make an informed trading decision. It was one reason why the original story was so suspect, because the stock should have been halted for that news. The gap up was caused because many sold short assuming the fraudulent PR was true and had to cover their trade. After the fraud was exposed there were no natural sellers, so the price had to rise to entice them. The only reason that EMLX was selling at 45 was because it would have been devastating news had it been true. It could not have opened where it did if that was not the level where buyers and sellers met. The MM's do not control the price on an NMS stock since the advent of ECN's and the Manning rules. Regards, Barb jj@coolinmyjetsinthemidwatch.cry