Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (86520)	8/26/2000 6:56:31 AM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

I'm up because I am a wonderful mother, as you are a wonderful father. (I think people who get up very early on Saturdays to do PARENTING things earn a lot of credit and should not be shy about taking it.) I was going to pay the bills and REALLY get ahead on this day before Ammo gets up at 6, but I'm just not THAT wonderful. Yet. Well, I hope there is a story behind it. I would hate to think Manet is such a sexist that he refuses to paint naked men. I do approve of his slightly chunky, very un-KateMosslike model. Have a fun and profitable day!

To: Neocon who wrote (86520)	8/26/2000 11:08:54 AM
From: Michael M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

If viewed as debauchery, the painting heightens the woman's nakedness from both the male and female perspective. Supercharging sexual nerve endings, especially the ones between the ears often results from unconventional or daring behavior. Shock, anticipation, even anxiety may add to the rush. Only a personal opinion. Please do not confuse this view of debauchery with a sweaty pile of drunks on the shag carpet in the basement rec room (haven't been there - haven't done that). Anyway, all painters are perverts, no? M