Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave B who wrote (51352)	8/27/2000 1:21:26 AM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Hi Dave B; Re Rambus longs not admitting their mistakes. Here's you making a stupid error: Apr 20, 2000 10:45 AM: (Dave B) Does anyone recognize the name "Via Technologies"? They're the company that built the PC133 chipset that Intel is suing. The company that's planning to build DDR chipsets. Here's an interesting link on their website. In their own words they consider dramreview.com "An Unbiased View of Memory Usage". And if the premier SDRAM/DDR supporter claims dramreview is unbiased, they must be! #reply-13470189 Apr 20, 2000 1:48PM: KeepItSimple You have got to be the most clueless person I have ever encountered in my life. If you took 1 second to read the list of website links in that VIA listing, you would see that they just cut and paste the PAGE TITLE from the particular website, and put it as the "description" for each link. In the instance of the dramreview.com site, the site itself titles the article: "An Unbiased View of Memory Usage". We've already discovered that the owner and author of dramreview was working for Rambus only a short while ago, so if you think you are fooling anyone by now claiming that VIA thinks dramreview is unbiased, because of the title dramreview assigns to their page, you are literally insane. #reply-13471952 Now, kindly show me the post where you admitted it? -- Carl

To: Dave B who wrote (51352)	8/27/2000 1:25:59 AM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Hi Dave B; Here you are accusing McComas and Inquest of being "bought and paid for." This is a pretty serious allegation. Bert McComas and Inquest are bought and paid for by Via and AMD. Check out the Platform99 agenda and speakers. ... As for Dataquest, I'd be cautious about claiming that they're bought and paid for. Their services are sold so widely that I wouldn't be surprised if they're bought and paid for by players on all sides. #reply-13463174 Now we have a situation where Dataquest is about to revamp their estimate of future RDRAM production. Are you then going to start accusing them of being bought and paid for? -- Carl