Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (6828)	8/28/2000 8:15:16 PM
From: EricRR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Scumbria: Starting at this post, there is a series of posts on Willy's small data cache by Paul DeMone. What do you think of it? Is Paul's point valid? aceshardware.com

To: Scumbria who wrote (6828)	8/29/2000 1:06:43 AM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

The problem is undoubtably a speedpath, which is not really a "heat problem". Some chunk of logic just doesn't run properly at 1.13GHz. I believe Intel is using multiple threshold voltages in their current logic designs. From the very large power increase between the 1GHz and 1.13GHz PIIIs, they seem to be right at the edge of the process window. If they can establish the "bad chunk of logic", it is possible to change the device threshold voltage locally to allow proper operation. Of course, this would require great diagnostics (they seem to have a problem there) and new Vt adjust masks. This scenario might allow for a late Oct. recovery since the threshold adjust comes after isolation but before gate. pure speculation, THE WATSONYOUTH