Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (123202)	8/29/2000 12:42:24 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1570081

Maybe I'm selfish, but I'd rather have a President who failed in his family life but succeeded in his job than the reverse. Sadly, that seems to have been the choice, lately. Dan, I agree that the economy has done well under Clinton. However, the Monica event was more than a failure of family life....it exposed a level of immaturity and lack of commitment not well suited to the position of President. I think the Presidency has too much power for someone to be operating at his level. No one made him run for office. And given his behavior during the Monica event, it appears that it would have been best had he not run. It seems he is coping with some serious psychological issues that have not been dealt with previously. That's my take of it. ted

To: Dan3 who wrote (123202)	8/29/2000 12:43:10 AM
From: Jeff Kirk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570081

Dan3 , I agree , and though I'm a simpleton compared to many who post here including Jim M. , I don't think it's accurate to call Bill a sociopath for lying , as ALL presidents must be adequate lairs as a prerequisite for the job . The ethics of the X-cia head {G. Bush} would much more fit the description than the current president.JK

To: Dan3 who wrote (123202)	8/29/2000 12:56:51 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570081

Dan, Which Presidents didn't have affairs? Scumbria