Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (32936)	8/28/2000 11:11:18 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I'll try to dig up that picture of the hooker's son who's a spitting image of Bill. I have more respect for bank robbers serving time in prison than I do for deadbeat fathers who sow their seed and then deny responsibility.

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (32936)	8/28/2000 11:26:11 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

flapjack, do you honestly believe the President didn't commit perjury? C'mon, even the most ardent Democratic supporters have to admit to that by now. Don't they? By the way, I believe the person in question owned up to his responsibilities and made amends as best he could. But I could be wrong because all the details escape me. After all, I never had to vote for him and he wasn't running for President of the United States. I'm relatively certain Republicans in his district held him reasonably accountable. Are you suggesting there have been NO Democrats who have fathered children out of wedlock? Shoot, even President Clintons brother was a dead-beat-dad. Do you think Bill or Hillary ever lent a hand to their niece who (from reports) simply wanted to be part of the family, while he was sanctimoniously passing legislation to 'go get those dead beat dads'? You see flapjack, that's the difference, Democrats (such as yourself) are still unwilling to acknowledge the fact that Clinton did anything wrong. Heck, we even had a few here recently who ludicrously tried to argue the meaning of the word 'sexual' again in order to defend him. Pretty pathetic if you ask me. Here's a song I am sure you'll enjoy. :) stream1.iims.intelonline.com