Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (123229)	8/29/2000 6:35:39 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570414

OT Under Clinton, a delicate balance was reached in the economy permitting economic expansion to continue unabated throughout his presidency. That sustained expansion has permitted the budget to be balanced and deficits reduced....a major feat. Maybe Clinton can not take full credit but at least some of the credit can be attributed to his administration. I think most of the credit that goes to any government or quasi-government body would go to the fed. I would give Clinton some credit for not doing anything to mess it up, but at least part of that is not for lack of trying. If Clinton had nationalized health care it would IMO have noticably harmed the economy. Crime is at its lowest levels in 20 years.....the reduction in urban crime has astounded most law officials in this country...again Clinton probably can not take full credit but certainly his administration is instrumental. Welfare rolls are the lowest in many years...in some states almost non-existent. This is mostly due to local police efforts and the efforts of state and local politicans. Most particuarly New York, which is large enough and reduced crime enough to have an impact on the statistics for the whole country. Law enforcement and crime prevention for the most part is and should be handled at a local and state level. If you claim that Clinton's handling of the economy reduced crime then you are just double listing his supposed accomplishment of helping the economy to grow strong (I've all ready stated that my opinion that he had little to do with). If other initiatives in your opinion made a bid difference then what initiatives and how did they make a big difference? Tim