Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (51747)	8/29/2000 2:41:40 PM
From: CAtechTrader	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

The granting of a patent is by statute considered a "ruling" , a challenge to a patent is fashioned as an appeal to a Patent Office "ruling"...that is what I am referring to by "ruling"...good luck splitting hairs...MU never would have begun negotiations if they believed the patents were no good....this is purely about royalty rates, negotiation by lawsuit is the American Way now...remember when ERICY said that QCOM's patents on CDMA were not valid?...price negotiating ploy pure and simple...no difference here.