Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (51809)	8/29/2000 6:00:39 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Zeev, Richard, I am surprised that you and Edelstone repeat this non sense about not licensing at all those parties defeated in court. Tate said it at the annual meeting. Dave

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (51809)	8/29/2000 6:17:10 PM
From: richard surckla	Respond to of 93625

Zeev... One of the talking heads said this, Edelstone and I are just repeating what was previously said. While it appears that it would be Rambus' option I think in the end if they won it would be bad business. Once you slay the dragon What's the sense to continue to teach it a lesson, especially if your gaining nothing? At this point I don't know if they could successfully win in an "unfair trade practices" suit or on what grounds it could be filed. Sherman act Clayton... I don't know. I'd have to review both to give a non-legal opinion, only my own.