Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BIFS ... Patented Environmental Cleanup and Low Float Co. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ScamSeeker who wrote (99)	8/29/2000 11:50:13 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 381

First off, it is impossible to even remotely compare SWOMI to wireless LAN as they are so different. Maybe the difference comes down to mere existence. Wireless LANs do exist. The rest is a bunch of surface level crap that means nothing. It is possible to have a pt to pt wireless connection using 802.11 that extends 60 miles if you have tall enough towers, the right kind and size of antenna and enough power...nothing special. I wonder if they understand the concept that this stuff is a shared medium and transmitting one tv quality video stream would wipe out the bandwidth for everyone else. That post did nothing to demonstrate that swomi isn't a wireless LAN. But you already know this. You would be amazed at how someone that is mildly technologically savvy could pull the wool over the eyes of greedy people with dollar signs in their eyes. Did you ever hear of funphone.com or webnode?