SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Barry Grossman who wrote (109035)8/30/2000 5:50:34 PM
From: Barry Grossman  Respond to of 186894
 
news.cnet.com

Intel sues Broadcom, claiming patent infringement
By Ian Fried
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
August 30, 2000, 1:30 p.m. PT

update Intel today filed a federal patent infringement suit against Broadcom, charging the communications chip company is building its business on Intel's know-how.

"The violations of Intel's technology rights described below appear to be part of a carefully crafted plan to build Broadcom's business using Intel's technology," Intel said in its suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Delaware.

Broadcom shares opened at $250.38 today and climbed as high as $257. But as investors received word of the suit, which was reported first by CNET News.com, the shares began to slide. In late trading, the shares dipped to as low as $232.75 before closing at $238.44.

In the suit, Intel alleges Broadcom has violated five Intel patents, one relating to networking, one to chip packaging and three to video compression. Intel is seeking an injunction preventing further infringement, plus unspecified damages and court costs.

Broadcom spokesman Bill Blanning said Intel made no efforts to resolve these issues before filing suit.

"This is the first we've heard of this complaint," Blanning said, adding that the company has yet to review Intel's suit.

"That said, we are confident in the soundness of our business practices and will vigorously defend (ourselves) against this complaint," he said.

Intel was an early investor in Broadcom, but relations between the two companies have grown increasingly contentious. The companies now compete in a number of emerging communications markets, such as high-speed networking.

In March, Intel went to Santa Clara County Superior Court seeking an injunction to prevent Broadcom from inducing former Intel employees to divulge trade secrets. On March 10, the court issued a preliminary injunction preventing Broadcom from "disclosing, using or acquiring" Intel trade secrets, Intel said in today's filing.

Intel also has a patent claim against Altima Communications, which Broadcom is acquiring. That action, first filed in December, relates to patents held by Level One Communications, the company Intel acquired last year in a $2.2 billion deal.

Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy said litigitation is a last resort for his company, but "Broadcom has demonstrated it has little respect for Intel's intellectual property."

"We have an obligation to our shareholders to protect the investment represented by our intellectual property," Mulloy said.

But Merrill Lynch analyst Joe Osha said Intel has shown plenty of willingness to go to court in the past, noting the enormous energy Intel spent trying to thwart Taiwan's Via Technologies, which was aiming to offer its own companion chipsets to Intel's microprocessors.

"They would have been better off finding a way to work with them," Osha said.

Osha said Intel has had limited success with its own efforts in the communications chip market.

"They've decided to sue the most successful company (in the market) instead," Osha said.



To: Barry Grossman who wrote (109035)8/30/2000 6:46:05 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 186894
 
Barry,

First Broadcom...next RAMBUS? <G>

Jim



To: Barry Grossman who wrote (109035)8/30/2000 8:23:39 PM
From: FR1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
I'm interested in the BRCM lawsuit. As I understand it, there was a INTC suit back in March against BRCM.

Can anyone fill me in on the details of exactly what Intel feels BRCM has done and the likelihood of the suit sticking is?

It is interesting that BRCM says INTC never contacted them before going to court.