Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (107806)	9/1/2000 2:23:17 PM
From: Bob Kim	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

Why is SQSW underperforming every quality XML vendor since the recovery in software which started a few weeks ago... this was one that was "hyped" on this thread. Lizzie, Why do you have to take this in such an ugly direction? SQSW is still up since HJ first mentioned it. I own SQSW, WEBM, and EBTI, but I'm glad I didn't buy WEBM when you sent me this reply. I think you are painting with too broad a brush. I don't think everyone takes things that personally. Frankly, the only person who I feel has been "nasty" to me is William. From 7/15, WEBM at $192: Bob, sorry I didn't get to you last week, but I've decided to play b2bi/xml with webm. I know it seems high now, but it is going much higher. If you are interested just read the few (less than 20) posts from the last week. There is a lockup expiration in Aug.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (107806)	9/1/2000 3:20:17 PM
From: H James Morris	Respond to of 164684

>2. Why is SQSW underperforming Well, let me think about that for one microsecond. Probably because there haven't been enough buyers to over power the sellers. You don't need to become an EXPERT on supply and demand economics to figure that out!