SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis V. who wrote (21367)9/2/2000 8:12:11 PM
From: Chisy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Haven't you remained bullish? As far as I know Don is and has been bullish on this stock. He invests in up and coming start up companies and has been pretty successful in his picks. At least that has been my experience. He is not a trader and neither am I. Perhaps we could have all made more money trading these stocks but I prefer the buy and hold principle. He has put stops out currently on one of his stocks and has been stopped out of a couple. It is very rare for him to suggest selling. I happen to think VLNC has a great future. Time will tell.



To: Dennis V. who wrote (21367)9/2/2000 8:35:34 PM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 27311
 
Dennis, if their was a Motorola "deal" in the works in February 1999 (at a time when VLNC's SEC filings said they had no product for sale), it seems to me that this would have been inside information since VLNC had not announced any such deal was in the works, nor had they named any of the customers who were sampling their products.

So, if there was a MOT "deal" in the works and Wolanchuk "knew" this as he claimed, it seems to me that Wolanchuk was in possession of material inside information. If there wasn't a deal in the works, then he was simply lying. After all, he didn't present this supposed Motorola deal as a speculation. He said he "knew."

Personally, I think Wolanchuk and various internet stock touts of VLNC hurt its credibility, not help it.