Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TechieGuy-alt who wrote (7508)	9/4/2000 8:52:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 275872

Blah blah blah, Sharky remains forever Intel Suckupextreme. If Sharky comes up again, I'll have to dig up Craig "Mako" Campanaro's "poignant" endorsement of Rambus memory from almost a year back once more. Cheers, Dan.

To: TechieGuy-alt who wrote (7508)	9/4/2000 8:58:02 PM
From: ajbrenner	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: "While we have only seen a small sampling of AMD's socket based CPUs, we have seen and heard of far too many Athlon Thunderbird processors and KT133 motherboards dying" Has anyone on this thread heard of this problem? Are Paul & Elmer saving this bit of bad news for a Christmas surprise? I have to belive that if there was any truth behind this statement those two would have been all over it like stink on you know what. ajb

To: TechieGuy-alt who wrote (7508)	9/4/2000 9:58:45 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

TG, Looks like the shark is a bigtime suckup to Intel. Cover ass IT people......Partly true, as they can say "Intel said do that" and the people lack the balls to challenge mighty Intel. Well, I recall the same being said about IBM, and look how they fell with microchannel....all the way to earth. Well, sharky's action are doubtless calculated to get advertising dollars. In the print we use to call it "yellow journalism" What do we call it now? "Yellow HTML" Ref: Beginnings of Yellow Journalism n 1898, newspapers provided the major source of news in America. At this time, it was common practice for a newspaper to report the editor's interpretation of the news rather than objective journalism. If the information reported was inaccurate or biased, the American public had little means for verification. With this sort of influence, the newspapers wielded much political power. In order to increase circulation, the publishers of these papers often exploited their position by sponsoring a flamboyant and irresponsible approach to news reporting that became known as "yellow journalism." Though the term was originally coined to describe the journalistic practices of Joseph Pulitzer, William Randolph Hearst proved himself worthy of the title. Today, it is his name that is synonymous with "yellow journalism." And now Sharky leads the way with Yellow html. The Sharky article is not well written or researched. Sharky should look to how he got where he is today, and how we can soon send him falling to earth. Bill