SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (52721)9/6/2000 4:16:46 PM
From: Jdaasoc  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Tenchusatsu:
Intel will have to step forward and publish their own DDR spec.
If Rambus claims that Intel spec PC100 memory infringes on it's IP, wouldn't Intel spec DDR most likely face the same problem.

It is starting to look like game, set, match to RMBS for DDR royalties IMO.

john



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (52721)9/6/2000 5:45:27 PM
From: jim kelley  Respond to of 93625
 
Ten

If there is no common DDR specification then it will be difficult if not impossible to have interchangeability of DIMMs among these proposed platforms. Where is JEDEC when you need them to actually do something? <LOL>

JK



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (52721)9/6/2000 6:23:19 PM
From: John Walliker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Tenchusatsu,

Wouldn't an Intel-derived DDR spec be a little too late in the game right now, since AMD and Via are going to be introducing DDR chipsets in the next quarter or two?

There are already five variants of DDR DIMMs proposed, so another one would hardly make any difference.

John


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News