SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (109518)9/8/2000 4:33:37 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
>Re: "No 1.3 Ghz Willy, more proof about Willys IPC being much less than P3"

Always able to find the worst possible interpretation aren't you Jim. Most others would be happy the binsplit is so high.


Elmer, forgive him. He picks stuff up on the AMD threads.

Tony



To: Elmer who wrote (109518)9/8/2000 4:33:54 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer
RE:"Always able to find the worst possible interpretation aren't you Jim."

Right Elmer...I made it all up...1.3 Mhz Willys will be abundant. Sure...

RE:"Most others would be happy the binsplit is so high"

The binsplit ought to be high...
Likely lots of headroom...
217 MM2 is big but not that big...
I don't think the Willy will be capacity restrained...
High platform cost, questionable performance and RAMBUS are the limiting factors...you know it.

Jim