SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Personal Digital Assistants (PDA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (40)9/11/2000 9:52:26 AM
From: Ausdauer  Respond to of 817
 
Win-Lose-Draw,

Jut my 2¢...

Message 14361063

Aus



To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (40)9/11/2000 10:04:34 AM
From: KevRupert  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 817
 
The Palm Vx runs about $400, and the Palm IIIC runs about $400. The RIMM model runs about $400-$500, and the HWP/Casio/Compaq models run about $500.

Have you looked at the Tech Investor magazine? If you haven't, let me point out that 1 of their top 11 models for innovativeness, best value, best wireless pda, best concept pda, and "also in the running" models is a Palm. The other 10 are the PDA competitor product lines.

If you feel that Palm has won the game, so be it. Nobody can change your mind about that. I don't know if you have used the competing PDA models. I have, and have expressed my opinions.

My point is simply that right now the Palm O/S is dominating the market. Nobody disputes that. (I would argue that the competitors offer more bang for the buck, but that is one person's opinion.)

As an investor, though, what I am concerned about is the future. I want to make money, period -- with whatever company can make me money. Not chearlead for a company.

I've seen Palm's latest 2 model offerings:

A) M100, which comes in second place to the Handspring in the low-end PDA model category.

B) Palm IIIC, which I own, comes in a horribly weak 3rd place to the HWP 545 (which I own), the Compaq iPaq 3650 (which I have back ordered). The Palm IIIC color is simply horrible compared to the competition.


The Tech Investor (see my earlier post) shows the stats: Palm is a simplistic PDA model. If that is their strategy, then more power to them. IBM lost ground to Compaq when IBM decided not to put the best chip in the PC -- in the 1980's. Consumers will always demand more and more. The reference of Palm becoming a WordPerfect causes me to think, not ignore the competition.

The thrust of my argument is that Palm can have the low-end PDA product line. The competition is innovating, and offering new features. MSFT has plans for wireless, with recent annoucements. Palm has too. RIMM's Blackbery 957 & the Ericsson Communicator offer great potential in the wireless space.

There will be plenty of money to go around in the PDA industry, as an investor. I want to be knowledgeable about what companies can make me money. Period. I pay my bills with companies that have stock prices that go up. Chearleading doesn't pay my bills, and it gives me a headache.