Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (2099)	1/21/2006 3:22:53 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12231

MQ + X = 2C Back to Moderated QUALCOMM stream [Su Zone] Message 22085685 Reposted here so that this is linked to the rest upstream here: To: Jon Koplik who wrote (49726) 1/21/2006 3:17:51 PM From: Maurice Winn of 49748 Jon, contrary to that study, cellphones do cause brain cancer: <They questioned 966 people with glioma brain tumors and 1,716 healthy volunteers about how long they had used mobile phones, the make and model, how many calls they made and how long the calls lasted. McKinney, Swerdlow and scientists from the universities of Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham said that among cancer sufferers the tumors were likely to be reported on the side of the head used with a mobile phone. But Swerdlow said it could be due to over-reporting of patients. "People have a tendency to remember and/or embellish or falsely remember those things that they think might be relevant," he said in an interview. McKinney said there is a lack of convincing and consistent evidence of any effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on the risk of cancer. > 966 people with glioma. That's 483 on the left brain and 483 on the right. Ooops, no, there are more on one side than the other. I have counted a LOT of people using cellphones and 75% of users hold the phone to their right ear. That's 3 people of 4. So, we should expect 3 of 4 cellphone-induced gliomas to be on the right side of the brain. That's because the signal is much stronger closer to the antenna than on the other side of the brain, having been attenuated through the brain. Sometimes, tumours will be caused on the left side of the brain, but relatively few. Maybe 20% of the right-side user tumours would occur in the left side of the brain. Glioma existed before cellphones, so cellphones cause only a small proportion of gliomas. The incidence of glioma hasn't gone from zero to whatever it is now in the last 15 years. Or in the last 100 years [people have held phones with inductive coils to their ears for many decades and for many hours - not to mention hair dryers which have coils and radiation. Suppose there are 10% of gliomas caused by cellphones. That would be a considerable risk for people. That would be 96 people of that sample they investigated. 75% right side cellphone users and 25% left would mean a ratio of tumours 72:24 right side: left side. For the whole sample, of 966 people with glioma, that would be about 507 right side tumours and 459 left side tumours. Oh, but wait, they didn't report which side the tumours were on. I wonder why that would be. They did say: <McKinney, Swerdlow and scientists from the universities of Leeds, Manchester and Nottingham said that among cancer sufferers the tumors were likely to be reported on the side of the head used with a mobile phone. But Swerdlow said it could be due to over-reporting of patients.> Yes, and it could be due to cancer caused by cellphones. So, what were the numbers? If there was a 1% extra risk due to cellphone use, the numbers would be 956 gliomas not due to cellphones and 10 due to cellphones. Those 10 would be 7 on the right side and 3 on the left. That would mean 428 + 7 on the right = 435 and 428 + 3 on the left = 431. 435:431. Oh, crikey!! They already said that there were more on the side that cellphone users reported, but tried to pass that off as inability of patients to report. Maybe it's really that the cellphones correlated with, and maybe even caused, 1% of the gliomas. There is no need for patient reporting [and the usual inaccuracies they give]. Count the tumours - there will be xrays or medical records. We know that 75% of people hold their cellphones on their right ears. Hey presto, we have the necessary information. Sure, maybe glioma people hold their cellphone on the OTHER ear for some reason. So there is some fine print to be taken care of. 1% gliomas is about how many would be caused according to my wave function calculations using the old equation [see Write What You Like Stream for details - search over several years required]. MQ + X = 2C M = microwave radiation Q-factor = quality factor of microwaves X = ionizing x-rays C = how many brain tumours form Theory derivation here: Message 14432944 The answer: People should demand 450MHz CDMA, or 800MHz. The higher the frequency, the more glioma they'll get. MUCH more. They should live where there are lots of people so the base stations are crowded and the cellphone will whisper. They should ditch their analogue and TDMA/GSM phones. They should wear a thin helmet, but very tough, to prevent not just cellphone signals, but gamma rays, and other radiation from penetrating their brains, also ultraviolet light on their bald patches. I am inventing such a practical application and fashion statement which will also reduce head injuries from bumps, falls, baton charges by police, drunken brawls, stone throwing and bullets [low-powered]. More details on MQ + X = 2C here Message 14359467 Message 14358755 Message 15171234 Message 14360155 etc... Theory before the Q factor: M + X = 2C Message 14433112 Message 14432944 Don't forget eye melanoma: Message 15182523 Another faulty study and Mq explanation: Message 15084472 etc.... Examination next week. Dose in rem and derivation of Q factor to be included. $100 reward for those who get 100%. Mqurice PS: Shortcut to Write What You Like stream and link to MQ + M = 2C Message 22085695