Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (32788)	9/11/2000 11:09:32 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 35685

I don't know who he is either, but that doesn't bother the kid, cuz JG doesn't know who I am, either. Someday, when I figure out all the questions, maybe I will try to get him to give me the answers. TK

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (32788)	10/23/2000 12:19:31 PM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

Actually, John Galt didn't have all the answers... if he had, he would've been the person who would've owned the land that Midas Mulligan purchased... and he would be rich. As far as we know, John Galt wasn't rich. John Galt was an opportunist who saw good men and brought them to the promised land. If he had all the answers, he would've have brought the musicians, artists, and productive talent to the land. It took him 12 years to get his woman, didn't it? John's even worse than a man who has all the answers... he has the capability to look at a situation without bias and judgement and then lay down judgement after careful research. He's ideal, but not because he knows everything. He's ideal because he's truly objective.