Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Charts for Quick CASH $$$ -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Metcalf who wrote (8946)	9/15/2000 12:19:56 PM
From: Galirayo	Respond to of 9262

[ COMPX ] John .. I've been out Digging since the Guest on CNBC yesterday. Looking for something I missed. COMPX .. NAZ has to be a close watch at this point ... we will know soon what will happen. Here's my latest take on the NAZ after todays move. Message 14391046 G'Luck! Ray

To: John Metcalf who wrote (8946)	9/15/2000 12:28:33 PM
From: Galirayo	Respond to of 9262

[ AKRN ] :) .. John .. I'd say it Shattered it!! :) How high is it going ? Any idea? TIA Ray

To: John Metcalf who wrote (8946)	9/15/2000 1:15:51 PM
From: scott_jiminez	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9262

[C & H]...John/Ray. Regarding your chart John - there seems to have been a similar C/H formed in mid-May yet the stock traded sideways until the recent breakout. Similarly, I posted a possible C/H formation on this thread about a month ago for this stock siliconinvestor.com and this, like the May AKRN pattern, had no follow through. Volume is much lower since the C/H of HDII. Another possible example of C/H 'formation-in-progress' is DXT. So John or Ray, from your understanding of C/H, is their some essential element, or elements, that separates the head-fake from the genuine thing (and I understand one must grant wide interpretive space for perceiving C/H i.e. they are rarely 'classic' formations). TIA Scott