SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: freeus who wrote (1994)9/18/2000 10:48:49 AM
From: StockHawk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
re:IBD's ranking of most-bought stocks by mutual funds

>> The limit is RS and EPS 80 or above. <<

Not on the recent list. The above is the cut-off criteria, but the list is ranked by highest combined score (198) until they fill their chart. The lowest ranked company this time had both ratings in the low 90's. This criteria likely eliminates 95% of companies right from the start. That seriously impairs the usefulness of the information, imho.

Many mutual fund managers use strategies such as buying stocks that rise above a long term average. Most stocks breaking above such an average may not show a relative strength of 80 or 90, and so they can never make the list.

If someone wishes to make the decision that they will only invest in stocks with the highest IBD rankings, then the listing is useful. That might be a fine investment criteria, and a good way to whittle down the stock universe into a manageable lot. It is perhaps similar to someone who decides to only consider gorilla companies or companies with 200% yoy revenue growth. However, IBD's own statistics often show that the best performing stocks had ranks in the 70's or 80's before making their major moves. These companies are excluded from the list we are discussing.

Sorry to go on about this, but with the daily parade of "best company lists" it is important to understand the selection criteria, and I'm sure not everyone who reads this thread is familiar with IBD's methodology.

StockHawk