Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: microhoogle! who wrote (37959)	9/19/2000 12:09:07 PM
From: kvkkc1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I read her columns, but she is one ignorant broad. Charley Reese, a conservative Democrat, and her alternate days in that space. I like to read Reese. Buchanan should have stayed on the Clinton News Network. I'm surprised flapjack doesn't support him. His isolationist policies are what the unions want.knc

To: microhoogle! who wrote (37959)	9/19/2000 12:09:19 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 769667

What do you think of the Marriage Functions Ordinance?

To: microhoogle! who wrote (37959)	9/19/2000 12:22:16 PM
From: Machaon	Respond to of 769667

<< It will help you make up your mind and may be vote for Pat Buchanan. >> Ahhhhh, old "head in sand" Buchanan. He wants to rid the world of the United Nations, the only forum in which all nations can communicate peacefully, rather than at war. He is terrified that the United Nations has the ability to become a world power. Is this a sane view? The power of the U.N. comes from the U.S. And, if we move the U.N. out of the U.S. we could lose a lot of control. What an idiot! Do we want to see a U.N. solely made of rogue states? Buchanan scares me so much, I would even vote for George "take it up the nose" Bush and Dick "Secretary of Defense for sale" Cheney, before I would vote for Buchanan.