SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5286)9/20/2000 2:17:44 PM
From: Casaubon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
SNDK 78 1/2

Thanks for the lead Zeev.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5286)9/20/2000 2:41:17 PM
From: Mark Johnson  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 30051
 
Zeev said: <<There is a danger of a major downturn developing>>



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5286)9/20/2000 3:19:41 PM
From: Rich1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
What happened to 4300 on the NAZ???



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5286)9/20/2000 4:12:46 PM
From: Logain Ablar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Hi Zeev:

People forget the DOW and DOW Transports when they focus on the NAZ. The DOW and NYSE have had some pretty good technical damage. Maybe a sign of things to come for the NAZ.

clearstation.com

clearstation.com

At this time people should be aware there is hightened risk in the market. High reward if you pick the right stocks but high risk if you have the wrong stocks. Remember we had the divergence early in the year and the NAZ finally tanked in March. It can happen again. I just hope we have till the election before the NAZ turns again.

I think we could finally be nearing the end of this bull run. However we can still see 50% gains in some of the stronger (and less huge PEG stocks like CSCO) tech stocks.

Its a traders market. Most investors who have been taught the Long Term Buy and Hold still haven't learned this lesson and will be caught again.

Good luck out there

Tim



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5286)9/20/2000 5:54:36 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 30051
 
Zeev, Is RMBS entitled to royalties on VIA DDR or SDRAM chipsets? People on the FOOL seem to think so, but why should supporting technology pay royalties or is there something in the chipset itself that would violate RMBSs patents?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News