Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (54900)	9/24/2000 10:02:44 AM
From: cellhigh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

hi bilow hi scumbria hi world..10k invested in rmbs 1/3/00 =50,000$.and all the while ddr this sdram that micron this/amd that. dont argue with the trend you've lost already.

To: Bilow who wrote (54900)	9/24/2000 10:59:20 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

<<Hi all; DDoDDRN: VIA to make integrated DDR CPU. Engineering samples 1Q01:>> So now we have progressed (or is it regressed) back to bragging about "ENGINEERING SAMPLES" in 1st Qtr. When will this progress to "Production SAMPLES" ? When will this progress to "Customer SAMPLES" ? When will this progress to "Limited PRODUCTION" ? When will this progress to "FULL PRODUCTION"? Yes - This was an AMAZING announcement all right! Meantime RDRAM has been in FULL PRODUCTION since last Nov-Dec.

To: Bilow who wrote (54900)	9/24/2000 10:23:43 PM
From: Dave B	Respond to of 93625

Carl, Wow! It didn't take long to get hypocritical, did it? In message 54900 you say: First of all, you still haven't shown a link where VIA said that they were going to use Samurai. What you have found, (in a sort of roundabout way), is a link showing that Jack Robertson said that VIA was going to license the Samurai. I know that Rambus heads are a bit short of processing power, but you must have realized that there is a a few bits of difference between "license" and "use", and between "VIA" and "Jack Robertson". So apparently reports from secondary sources are not acceptable. Then in message 54901, you claim "VIA to make integrated DDR CPU. Engineering samples 1Q01" based on a slide from www.watch.impress.co.jp (and who knows where that came from). I know that you bears are a bit short of processing power, but you must have realized that there is a a few bits of difference between "VIA" and "www.watch.impress.co.jp". I don't see Via saying anything about a supposed "Matthew 2" anywhere. Even worse, you commit the same sin you complained about in your very next post! But don't worry about doing it again. I'm sure the bulls will be happy to notice from now on when you're making claims based on information from a secondary source instead of the company directly. LOL! Dave