Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (111193)	9/25/2000 11:32:05 AM
From: JDN	Respond to of 186894

Dear Mary: Thats the spirit, keep it up. I'd like to see this stock climb at least back into the 60's. JDN

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (111193)	9/25/2000 12:08:46 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Mary re:most importantly for us investors is that he is a proven winner how is that? By bringing down all mighty intel? Where is the production might? Intel is instructing analysts to include one time gains as recurring gains. Where are the products? Intel demoed 2GHz chip running for few seconds while not been able to match production-level speed of amd chips. Barret counted on amd's screw up rather than doing his job and amd did not screw up, ouch. But guess what instead of kicking him out intel investors talking of proven winning track record. I suggest that you should give him a larger bonus too. When did Barret let us down? I would ask - when did not he..... Re:the nonsense in the Redherring article I did not read the article but it seems that everyone else is talking that intel is full of it (including dell) ..... Regards -Albert