SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (56)9/27/2000 12:25:21 PM
From: M. Frank GreiffensteinRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
There's a great article in Grant's Investor newsletter on the daunting technical obstacles to mass produciton of fuel cell technology:http://www.grantsinvestor.com/GiCustomerServlet?WebLogicSession=OdIe23PCyhKf86sUxwTAqwZ1ISU18VM0VSAEIsfjiIMhReBGQCuLjcQGvnALd58XdIxgVt20hzE3|-7998917255314109978/-784428044/5/7001/7001/7002/7002/-1|-4080606382711340194/-784428043/5/7001/7001/7002/7002/-1|-7998917255314109817&handler=CustSearchHomeViewHandler&action=Find&simpleSearch=Y

Susbcribers only. I think they offer free 2 weeks subs.

DocStone



To: ahhaha who wrote (56)9/27/2000 12:30:24 PM
From: FR1Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
ot
Ahh, I am interested in your view on the fundamental weakness/strength of fuel cells.

I note that businesses like FCEL and BLDP are deploying working models now or next year. Governments, like California, are giving it a push demanding that 4% of all vehicles sold in 2003 be "zero emission" (Fuel Cells and water vapor is ok).

FCEL contends their models, which sell to businesses, compete favorably with utility rates. PLUG once said the same thing but if you look at the figures it is questionable.

BLDP, as we know, is going into cars and busses. The city of Oakland ordered a dozen or more busses - the first two of which will deliver next year.

Many people seem to argue that the best model is to have reformers (the box that extracts hydrogen from gas) at gas stations and just the Fuel Cells in the cars. Hydrogen would be stored in gas tanks using MetalHydrides (ENER does this). The tank is safer than gas if it punctures.

Others argue that both the reformer and cell will have to be on board vehicles to start with.

I assume that from the physics point of view the question is which path gets us the most energy with the least pollution.

The fuel cell model extracts hydrogen from each carbon, which costs energy, and puts it through the cell.

Our current model simply explodes the gas (far cheaper) but is much more inefficient and polluting.

I know you have probably given some thought to this and I wonder if you would share it with us.



To: ahhaha who wrote (56)10/10/2000 3:24:39 PM
From: ElsewhereRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 24758
 
There are much better ways to solve the superficial problems in energy.

Which ones? Fusion? Solar energy? Less/more efficient consumption? Or is it a mute point because a free market will find the best solution anyway? Is Hawking right with his greenhouse fear or was he just promoting his book?

dailynews.yahoo.com
Saturday September 30 9:34 AM ET
Greenhouse Effect Worries Hawking