Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (55521)	9/27/2000 3:47:02 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Bilow, Thanks for the input. Points well taken but not technical road blocks, IMO. #1 - I don't see that as a technical road block. #2 - With RDRAM being a 16 bit technology, how does it increase the pinout of a RIMM by a large amount? I mean, SDRAM has 4 times the size and I don't see that being a problem for DIMMs. #3 - I also don't consider that a problem. Why would it be harder to match wire lengths/signal lengths? On a single RIMM PCB, why can't each half of the PCB duplicate the wire lengths for each channel? Same on the mobo. Again, IMO, I don't see that as a technical road block. IMO, I think such a system could be in the cards for the future.